Skip to main content
IlmHive

Mubham and the path to clarifying it

Syed Fahīm al-Dīn1 min read

If the name of the narrator is not mentioned, such as one saying:

  • أَخْبَرَنِيْ فُلَان – so and so informed me; or 
  • شَيْخ – a shaykh; or 
  • رَجُل – a man; or 
  • بَعْضُهُمْ – some of them; or 
  • إِبْنُ فُلَان – the son of so and so; or 
  • ثِقَة – a thiqah narrator

Then all of these will be termed mubham.[1]

The name of the narrator can be inferred through looking at another path where the name is identified. 

This is also a form of mursal[2] and its ruling takes the same ruling of mursal according to the fuqaḥā and usūliyyīn, rather this is the view of scholars from the early generations.[3] The view of the latter day scholars is that this narration is muttaṣil (connected), with a majhūl narrator in the sanad.


[1] Literally; unintelligible, abstract. Thus, muhmal is where the name of the narrator is known, but the narrator is unclear. Whereas mubham is the case where the name of the narrator is not mentioned. 

[2] Mursal can have two meanings: (1) where the narrator is dropped anywhere in the chain, (2) the ṣaḥābah is dropped. 

[3] Mutaqaddimīn

Continue reading

Related notes